To say that humans are essentially “religious” is to claim that they are primed to worship, wired devote themselves to something as ultimate, to ascribe “worthship” to some ultimate end. So while people might be “taking leave” of belief in God or gods, or “apostasizing” from specific communities of religious practice, I don’t think that is sufficient to conclude that “religion is not universal or necessary.” On my account, secular devotion is not just “analogously” religious: it is religious. It is an expression and product of “secular liturgies.
15 Notes/ Hide
-
natalieenne liked this
-
mushfromnewsies reblogged this from invisibleforeigner
-
azspot liked this
-
kittentroops liked this
-
notadinnerparty reblogged this from invisibleforeigner
-
anotherword liked this
-
thumbsup4rockandroll liked this
-
acceptandembrace reblogged this from invisibleforeigner
-
hours reblogged this from invisibleforeigner and added:
“I don’t think a Christian account of ‘religion’ requires that we identify religion with belief in God. Whether one...
-
godthings reblogged this from invisibleforeigner and added:
“I don’t think a Christian account of ‘religion’ requires that we identify religion with belief in God. Whether one...
-
mushfromnewsies liked this
-
mumbledtheology liked this
-
mshedden liked this
-
aurora-knight liked this
-
invisibleforeigner reblogged this from commentmagazine
-
commentmagazine posted this

